Defense trade exhibitions: managing compliance challenges on a defense exhibition

Eurosatory, Le Bourget, Euronaval… Defence trade shows represent, for companies within the defence industrial and technological base, events that are as strategically significant as they are exposed. Global showcases for national and allied expertise, they are also sensitive exhibition environments, subject to compliance risks that the industry has yet to fully integrate into its event planning.

As requirements in export controls, anti-corruption and international sanctions compliance continue to intensify, participation in these events demands the same rigour as a strategic contract.

1. A unique exhibition, strict constraints

Major defence trade shows invariably bring together three categories of actors:

  • civilian and military industry representatives from dozens of countries,

  • official delegations, both civilian and military, representing a broad cross-section of the international community,

  • and thousands of trade visitors, among whom are, inevitably, nationals or representatives of sanctioned states or states subject to export restrictions.

In this dense and open environment, every stand, every demonstration and every document distributed becomes a potential vector for the illicit transfer of information or a breach of applicable regulations.

2. Specific risks on exhibitions for defence manufacturers

2.1. Potential breaches related to hospitality

Social events organised around the Show, if not strictly controlled, can expose companies to corruption risks. Gifts, invitations, or advantages offered to foreign public officials must remain of strictly moderate value and be validated by compliance teams, in accordance with the Sapin II Law.

2.2. Unauthorised disclosure of sensitive information

The line between commercial communication and disclosure of sensitive information can be thin at an event like Eurosatory or Le Bourget. An interactive demonstration, an insufficiently filtered brochure, or an informal exchange may reveal strategic data: radar performances, material specifications, sensitive industrial processes. Such communications, when concerning controlled goods or technologies, may constitute intangible transfers requiring prior authorisation.

2.3. Inappropriate contact with nationals from sanctioned countries

The variety of delegations present exposes exhibitors to the risk of interacting with entities subject to sanctions or restrictions. Some shell companies or informal delegations may hide their true affiliations. Engaging in technical exchanges or providing documentation without rigorous identification can result in serious violations of French or European sanctions regimes.

2.4. Information gathering and economic interference risks

Finally, the presence on an exhibition of foreign actors pursuing economic intelligence objectives requires constant vigilance. Every informal conversation, every unmonitored technical demonstration, represents a potential opportunity for capturing strategic information.

The French Defence Intelligence and Security Directorate (DRSD) regularly reminds companies that trade shows are prime targets for sensitive information collection. It is strongly recommended to refer to the DRSD's memo on securing participation in trade shows, available on defense.gouv.fr.

3. How to ensure compliance on an exhibition

3.1. Before the show

  • Map out products and communications: every element to be disclosed must be validated by legal and compliance teams.

  • Train sales, marketing, and technical teams on specific risks (sanctions, sensitive goods, corruption).

  • Set clear procedures for identifying interlocutors before any in-depth presentation.

3.2. During the show

  • Limit access to technical information to identified visitors, preferably after validation of a non-disclosure agreement (NDA) if necessary.

  • Refuse advanced demonstrations to persons not previously cleared or from restricted states.

  • Strictly control gifts and invitations to official delegations according to a pre-approved internal policy.

3.3. After the show

  • Maintain a register of significant visitors met at the booth.

  • Assess any compliance incidents that may have occurred during the event.

  • Inform competent authorities if necessary, should any concerns arise from certain interactions.

4. A reputational and market access challenge

Beyond immediate legal risks, failure to comply with regulations on an exhbition can:

  • Significantly damage the company's reputation with French and foreign authorities;

  • Weaken the future ability to obtain export licences;

  • Create vulnerabilities to influence operations or economic destabilisation campaigns.

In an environment where French technological sovereignty is under close scrutiny, commercial success on an exhibition must be matched by excellence in compliance.

5. Conclusion

Participation in an exhibition is a unique strategic opportunity for BITD companies. However, this opportunity is sustainable only if supported by constant vigilance.
In an era of strengthened export controls, anti-corruption compliance, and economic interference threats, mastering compliance on an exhibition is no longer just a precaution, it is an operational imperative.

Previous
Previous

Internal investigation in the defence industry

Next
Next

Why compliance must now embrace political and geopolitical risk